Web Design and SEO Strategies in Massachusetts

What you’ll get from us:

  • Holistic Approach. What the heck is holistic? It’s putting all those individual elements (design, code, SEO, and social media) into a blender and serving up a solid web-marketing platform that will attract customers all while being flexible enough to help your company grow with future web technologies.

  • Expertise. We got the degrees and then worked for government, big companies, small companies and higher ed. With 15+ years of experience in web design and marketing, we’ve been around the block and experienced what works and what doesn’t. When we’re not working on a project we’re keeping up-to-date with industry changes so that we can design something for you that meets web standards for today and tomorrow.

  • A Company in Your Backyard. We’re conveniently located in Central Mass. and only cater to companies and non-profits in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. Because we live and work near you, it’s likely that we are already familiar with your company and local competition.

We invite you to check out our many web-marketing services and call, 508.425.6776, or email to discuss your goals and how we can help you achieve them.


Latest Blogs:

Author Archive

Want to build a Solid Website? Start with a Goal

Too many times I have heard this from a client, “I need a website.”  and often my response is “why?” This question is usually met with a very quizzical look from the client.

Shouldn’t I want to make a site for them? It is my job after all, isn’t it?  And doesn’t EVERYBODY have a website? Unfortunately, these are the worst reasons to create a site.

Web Design in the corporate and marketing world has been around for the last 15-20 years but a lot of people still don’t get that a website is not some mythical creation that will solve all of their problems. It is simply a TOOL that will help accomplish a specific goal or set of goals. Without goals in mind for your site, you’re just wasting your time and money.

Why having goals in mind is important.

Every web site, and individual page for that matter, should have some tangible goal attached to it; Whether it is to guide the user to buy a specific product, or to provide them with information.  This goal should then be tied to a task that you want the user to accomplish while on the page (or site).

It is important to have all goals defined in the initial phases of a design so that all of the design elements refer back to that goal or set of goals.

For example, if my goal is to increase sales of a specific product (or products), I would need to have all my content, navigation, and graphical elements designed in such a way to point the user in the direction of buying that product.  Items like the “Buy” button would have to be prominent, navigation should be simplistic, and the content should be clear and succinct.

However, if the goal is to provide the user with a how-to guide, then my entire design strategy changes to a more text-heavy/detailed type of page.  If appropriate, detailed images should be a part of the design showing the parts/functionality of that product.

These are two completely different goals, each with a completely different design approach.

Far too often in web development, the page is designed and in place before the goal is fully defined. This usually results in pages and sites that try to do too much (or too little) and the results are typically poor.

The 40-20-40 Approach to Design:

When I’m working on a project, I typically like to follow the 40-20-40 engineering plan.

During a project you should spend 40% of your time on requirements analysis and design, 20% on actually coding/developing the product, and 40% on testing the finished code/site.

Often times I’ve seen the design and the testing phases cut just to get a product out as fast as possible. While this typically met short-term goals (on schedule and on budget) it often led to long-term side effects (things are harder to update and bugs are harder to find due to the “rushed” code or design) or worse, the finished product did not meet all the goals of the business.

Defining goals, and a design approach to meet those goals, should take up about 40% of the development cycle.  This is the crucial time to ask questions, put a lot of forethought into the design, and think about the requirements/resources that will be needed to maintain the project once it is launched.

On the flip side, 40% of project’s time should be set aside for testing and feedback before it is released to the public. This avoids having the user find problems on your site before you do, which could potentially hurt your goal conversion rates.

The coding and development phase is the easy part and really should be the quickest part of the whole process. If the proper time was devoted to the requirements and design phase, the coding portion of the project will typically come in ahead of schedule and under budget.

The other benefit of defined goals – measuring them.

The best part of setting goals is that with a solid analytics process in place, you can then measure them.

Google Analytics allows you to see how your new design reacts in comparison to your old design. It also allows you to find bottlenecks and issues that can then be fixed or experimented with so that you can constantly keep improving your conversion rate.

Without clearly defined goals, it’s tough to measure or make improvements on anything.

Conclusion:

Everything about your site (and your pages) needs to point back to the goals that you set up early on in the process.  The more work you put into flushing out and designing for your goals, the easier it will be for your site to meet these goals.  Its really that simple.

Sites that are built before all of the clients goals are properly defined usually end up in disaster and can cost the client a lot more time and money to fix the site so that it “conforms” to these new goals.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Web Writing – The toughest job on the Web

The first step to creating a solid web foundation is also the step that is most often overlooked – the writing and development of content.

Make no mistake, content is king when it comes to web design but so many corporations focus on the “glitzy” components of web design, such as SEO and social media, that they lose focus on the basics of web marketing.

Good content leads to a good web strategy

Unfortunately, a lot of organizations fail to realize the importance of having rich and reviewed content on their pages. Too often upper management is focused on getting users to the site with launching SEO campaigns and new projects but what they fail to realize is that it’s only half the battle. No matter what the situation is, when the foundation of your site is built on quick sand no amount of SEO, social media tools or design will fool your users.

People Don’t Read! So why am I writing this?

Jakob Nielsen said it best when he categorized how how user’s read on the web

They don’t read. . .

They scan . . . especially when it comes to any site that tries to market anything. People might read a full news article if they are interested but when it comes to any type of web marketing, less is always more and this is where a lot of websites and web-marketing strategies fail.

Only 20% of all web users actually read every word on a website while the rest (including myself), scan a page for items that pop out to them. Marketers and content-owners should pick their words carefully, choosing text that grabs the user’s attention and entices them to perform a task (aka a ‘call to action’) or read further.

Visual design elements like headings, typeface, and bulleted lists are powerful allies in the fight to get users to pay attention to your content. However, it is important to remember that the words themselves make a difference. Over-marketing/spinning, also known as market-ease, is quickly recognized and ignored by most users.

How to Combat “Marketing Disregard”

In Nielsen’s book, Eyetracking Web Usability, Nielsen describes the concepts of “Selective Disregard” and “Banner Blindness,” in which user’s brains are subconsciously trained to view areas with good content and ignore areas with bad content, such as ads.

The concept of Selective Disregard can also be applied to words on a website as well. People know when they are being marketed towards and hate being force-fed market-ease.

So if people hate reading, and hate reading marketing material even more, how do you market your wares to the user?

Give the user what they want:

  • to feel in-control of their experience
  • to have their expectations met quickly and;
  • access to valuable content

When reviewing content for new products, I try to keep these points in mind:

  • Remember that the user’s time is VERY valuable
  • Honesty is the BEST policy (Don’t claim stuff that isn’t true)
  • How does the product/service help them do what they need to do?
  • (Quickly answer) Why are you better than your competitor?
  • Always give them what they need to move on (price, ordering info, etc.)
  • Only use images if it tells something about your service or product

Keep your content simple, honest, and to the point. By bringing your most important information to the forefront and keeping the distractions to a minimum, users easily digest information which makes them feel in control.  An in-control user will spend more time on your site and more time exposed to your products, services and brand. Not only do you want users to spend more time on your site but you want them to return to your site. If they leave your site having had a good experience, your site will likely be top of their mind for next time.

Web Writing – The toughest job on the Web

People either hate writing content and thus never give it to you on time or they are very passionate about it and give you more copy than you know what to do with.

Good web content is clear, honest and presented in as few words as possible, all while still maintaining a passion and energy that draws readers in and keeps them there. In my opinion, this makes web writing one of the toughest jobs in web development. The designers and coders get all the glory but it’s the content that is what really makes the sale.

I strongly advocate to companies that are serious about building a web strategy to invest in a writer devoted solely to the Web.  Writing for print is not the same as writing for the Web since users read these items differently. Reusing content from your print material or relying on a traditional writer is usually not good enough. A true web writer needs to balance passion with a Twitter-esque word count, something that very few people have the talent to do.  Great web writers are out there but they are usually underrepresented and undervalued.

Writing for the Web is tough, it can make or break a site, but good writing can make all the difference in a site’s usability, sales and traffic.

- Ryan

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Is Flash Finally Dying a Slow Death? (Part 4)

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Accessibility

SEO is a major buzzword in most marketing departments. Organizations want to be #1 on Google and some will spend millions of dollars a year trying to get there. Unfortunately for Flash – its not that friendly to Search Engines, as most of the elements that make up a flash movie are graphic-based – and most search engines can only read text-based items. So while its fine for you to put up a custom Flash animation on your site, don’t expect it to boost your Search Rankings. (Note: Search engines can read text-based Flash Elements, but since most people use graphics in their flash movies, its a moot point).

The second issue for Flash is that it is not very ADA (Americans With Disabilities Act) friendly, precisely the reason why its not SEO friendly – text vs.graphics. Since most screen readers, software that visually impaired people use to browse the web, have a hard time deciphering graphics, they also have a hard time reading Flash movies. Now, while you might not have too many clientele that have visual issues, there are many people that do and if you care about attracting these people, then you really should consider providing them with screen-readable content. This may mean creating an alternative to your flash movie or ditching Flash entirely

Even worse for Flash is that HTML 5 is all text-based, screen readers and search engines will love it. Even with the newest features in HTML5, it will still be a very text-friendly platform and have far more SEO and accessibility benefits than Flash currently can provide.

If you can get the same look and feel using HTML5 that you can in Flash, what would you choose?

Can Flash Survive?

So is Flash doomed? In my opinion, no, I think there will be a spot for Flash on the web for many years to come. For one, some people will just prefer using it over anything else and secondly it still has a year or two to figure out how to combat HTML5 before HTML5 really becomes a viable alternative in the marketplace.

Adobe has been here before. A couple of years ago when bad Flash movies or entire Flash-based sites were all over the web, a HUGE backlash against anything Flash ensued. People were tired of cheesy animations and long load times. It was hunted down by usability consultants and almost became extinct.

Eventually Flash found its niche, animations on some pages started to spring back up and the biggest benefit for Flash came when online videos took off (Flash is one of the best video compressors for the web). This rebirth of Flash made it cool to be a Flash Developer again and with Flex and ActionScript 3.0 being strongly considered some of the best web application tools around, it once again has a solid reputation in the web world.

My feeling is that Flash is going to have to be reborn again within the next 3-5 years and I think Adobe can pull off another recreation of a product it bought out from Macromedia years ago. Even if it doesn’t change much, it will still be around – just in a much smaller role.  And maybe - Adobe’s future is in developing a 3D web platform – as mentioned in a blog post on July 8th.

As for Apple in all of this, its just very strange that a company would not support a development tool that could potentially help their sales. This makes me think that there is more to this Flash vs. Apple battle than meets the eye. Apple and Adobe have too long of a history together for Apple to just dump them.

So What are your thoughts?  Will Flash live on? Or does Adobe need to face the fact that Flash is on it’s death-bed?

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Is Flash Finally Dying a Slow Death? (Part 3)

Open Source and Standards

Another issue surrounding Flash is that it is controlled by one organization, Adobe. Flash is not considered “open-source,” which means that Adobe does not allow outside developers or corporations to modify the product, unlike other platforms and languages such as WordPress, OpenGL, and to a degree HTML (which is controlled through an independent committee called the W3C or World Wide Web Consortium).

What makes open source so nice  to developers and users is that anyone can collaborate on the language and add new functionality at will. However, this is also one of the negatives of Open Source. Just because you can contribute, doesn’t mean that you should – and there are many “Open Source” tools out there that don’t work, or worse – can cause harm a program our your computer. However – there are typically far more features that do work properly, and can greatly expand the original functionality of a language or product immensely. WordPress is an example of that – there are tend of thousands of plug-ins available that can easily improve the functionality of a blog within seconds – no long hours of development time!

It is somewhat difficult (but not impossible) to make money off an open-source language or product and let’s face it, Adobe want’s to make money off of Flash. So why would they take a closed tool and open it up for anyone to use or develop for? One possibility is that they begin to lose business to a competing product and they simply have no other choice.

Adobe has some time to weigh that decision, as HTML5 is still not a serious competitor to Flash yet, but if they wait to long to tackle the issue they might find themselves in quite a predicament in the next couple of years.

So what do you think? Should FLASH go open-source?  Will that save Flash? Or is it already too late?

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Is Flash Finally Dying a Slow Death? (Part 2)

Why HTML5 Might Render Flash Useless

To understand why HTML5 might kill off Flash is a little complex. First and foremost it is completely brand new to the web world, in fact, a lot of major web browsers, such as IE don’t even support its basic features yet, and the official release of the language won’t be a for quite a while.

So why even worry about HTML5 if its not available yet? Simply because its coming and it looks like it might be sooner than a lot of people think. Browsers such as Firefox, Safari, and Chrome are already supporting some features of HTML5 and there has been a lot of buzz (and support) in the development world about what it will allow developers to do.

HTML5 is promising a lot of the same things that Flash is used most for – animations, support for vector-graphics, ability to use multiple fonts, and the encoding of high-quality movies. Sites like Hulu currently use Flash to encode all of it’s movies but YouTube already has a site with videos encoded with HTML5 functionality. If developers can do all the same things that Flash can do in a language that they already know and use daily, then why would they want to learn Flash?

While ActionScript 3.0 (the backbone coding language to Flash and Flex) is a very powerful object-oriented programing language that can be used to build very complex applications, the truth is that a lot of Flash developers don’t even use it. Why? Because most Flash developers are not software engineers and don’t have a strong understanding on the fundamentals of Software Engineering or object-oriented programming (which is required to really handle some of the nuances of ActionScript 3.0). Most developers are just looking to design an animation with a few buttons, maybe a movie and call it a day

It also doesn’t help that when Adobe came out with ActionScript 3.0, it was a total overhaul of their previous language ActionScript 2.0, thus leaving many developers (including myself) having to relearn Flash in order to even use some of the simple functionality of the tool.  On the other hand,  HTML5 promises not to make any major structural changes to the code but instead add some new ‘tags’ that can be used for new functionality while keeping the same base that developers have been using for years.

Are you using HTML5?  Do you think Flash will survive once HTML5 is supported on all browsers (IE9)?

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Is Flash Finally Dying a Slow Death? (Part 1)

With Apple refusing to support Flash on the iPad and iPhone, and HTML5 on the horizon – is Adobe Flash nearing its end?

First off, let me say that I like Flash and I use it at least once a week on different projects. While I’m not a Flash expert, I know it well enough to get what I need done. I have a great respect for Flash and all Adobe products for that matter). With the advent of ActionScript 3.0 and Flex, the Flash family of tools is one of the most powerful web application development platforms out there. However, there are some very tough challenges that await Flash – that in my opinion, will have be answered, or else Flash’s days might be numbered.

The Apple Problem

First, there’s the Apple problem. Back a few weeks ago, Steve Jobs, the founder and CEO of Apple came out and publicly released a statement on why they are no longer supporting Adobe Flash Player on any of its current (or new) mobile devices such as the iPhone and iPad.

Why would Apple do such a thing? Well, for one, they can. The success of Apple’s iPads and iPhones has given Steve Jobs a lot of pull in the consumer electronic market place, and right now a lot of people think he can do no wrong. However, it is interesting that Apple would turn its back on Adobe. The two have always had a very close partnership with one an other. I actually remember back in the 90s when Adobe was about the only company that would write software for the Mac. If I ever knew then what I know now, I would have bought lots of stock in Apple back then.

Personally, I don’t think Apple would simply turn its back on a long-time partner such as Adobe and publicly bash one of Adobes major products like Flash without knowing something about the future of the web and mobile technology. Apple is gambling on the idea that the future of the web for the next 5-10 years will be with the release of HTML5 (backbone language behind 99% of all websites).

What do you think, do you think Apple is crazy or do you believe they wouldn’t be where they are today if it wasn’t for knowing what’s coming down the pike?

4 comments - Latest by:
  • Ryan
    Most basic effects that are done with flash can now be done with the jQuery JavaScript library. jQuery is becoming ...
  • josephbm91
    Most basic effects that are done with flash can now be done with the jQuery JavaScript library. jQuery is becoming ...
Share/Bookmark

Hanover’s Personal Insurance Website

Hanover Personal Lines Site

Hanover Personal Insurance Website

http://www.hanover.com/thg/personal

Technologies Used: Flash, XHTML, CSS, JavaScript

This site was designed to inform customers and independent agents about Hanover Insurance’s personal lines of insurance for home and automobiles. The site was launched in March 2010 and replaced an older version of the site which had been stagnant for some time. From a technical standpoint the site is relatively simple, utilizing CSS and XHTML as a base, and JavaScript for some of the menus and tabbed windows. At the clients request, a flash movie was used for the homepage.

Since the launch of the new site, site traffic had increased by roughly 30% and the site has been steadily climbing in search engine positions and currently resides in the top 20 for the “personal insurance” keyword.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Hanover’s Your Best Partner Microsite

Your Best Partner Website

Your Best Partner Website

http://YourBestPartner.Hanover.com

Technologies Used: XHTML, CSS, JavaScript, Flash

Your Best Partner was a Hanover marketing campaign designed to allow independent insurance agents to learn about new products and services available in 2009 and 2010. The site was originally created in Flash but was redesigned with standards compliant CSS and XHTML for accessibility and search engine optimization purposes. The site uses CSS and JavaScript for navigation.

Since launching with the new layout and design, search engine traffic increased an astounding 1,128%. This site demonstrates how a simple redesign can improve search engine results and traffic.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Harvard Apparatus

Harvard Apparatus Website

Harvard Apparatus Website

http://www.harvardapparatus.com

Technologies Used: Websphere Commerce, Java Server Pages (JSP), CSS, Flash, JavaScript, XHTML

Harvard Apparatus is a bio-lab equipment supplier located in Central Massachusetts. The website is a full-fledged e-commerce site and was designed for customers to be able to find out detailed information about Harvard Apparatus’s vast product line and to be able to order on-line. The site also features an extensive on-line library of research papers, a custom designed search engine, and cross-sell/up-sell support. The site runs on IBM Websphere Commerce and utilized site-caching to help improve page performance.

Search Engine efforts revolve around the companies main product lines of Syringe Pumps and Infusion Pumps, where it is consistently ranked in the top five positions in all of the major search engines for these highly competitive keywords. The company also utilizes Google AdWords campaigns as part of its e-marketing strategy

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Scientific Lab Supply

Scientific Lab Supply Website

Scientific Lab Supply Website

http://ScientificLabSupply.com

Technologies Used: CSS, XHTML, ProStores e-commerce

Scientific Lab Supply is a wholesaler for industrial lab equipment that sells directly to the customer through their e-commerce website. The site features a secure administrative back-end that allows staff to add new products, adjust prices, and manage sales, in addition to the standard e-commerce front-end that consumers see. The site utilizes a PayPal connector to process credit card transactions.

Search Engine Optimization efforts were focused on the major product lines. Despite being a new site and competing with much larger companies, they are constantly ranked in the top 10-20 positions for their product line

5 comments - Latest by:
  • josephbm91
    Well this idea has already been implemented http://techcrunch.com/2008/07/30/labmeeting-a-social-network-for-scientists/#idc-container I would differentiate this from the social media norm, something that goes more along ...
  • Ryan
    Just how social can Scientific Lab supplies be? Personally I think it’s a waste of resources. Science has no innate ...
Share/Bookmark
Category: Portfolio  Tags: , ,  5 Comments

KD Scientific

KDScientific Website

KD Scientific Website

http://KDScientific.com

Technologies used: CSS, XHTML, JavaScript, Flash, ASP

KDScientific is a wholesale lab equipment supplier based in Central Massachusetts. Their website is designed to promote their products and allow for labs and educational institutions to find out about their product and then request a personalized quote.

The site is built on an ASP based platform, and utilizes an Javascript based menus. Flash is also used across the site for its featured products and instructional videos.

Search Engine Optimization efforts focused on their top products, such as Syringe Pumps, where it is consistently ranked in the top 3 on Google and other search engines, despite heavy competition from much larger companies

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Ryan and Becky’s Wedding Website

Ryan And Becky's Wedding Website

Ryan and Becky's Wedding Website

http://RyanAndBecky09.com

Technologies Used: CSS, XHTML, JavaScript, PhP, and Flash.

A basic wedding website for a couple to post information about an upcoming wedding to guests. A PhP/MySQL based form allowed guests to send in song ideas for the wedding. The site also included a flash-based image gallery of the couple and of events leading up to their big day.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Nipmuc Water Ski Club

Nipmuc Water Ski Club Homepage

Nipmuc Water Ski Club Homepage

http://www.NipmucSkiClub.org

Technologies Used: CSS, XHTML, custom graphics

The Nipmuc Water Ski Club is a non-profit organization on Webster Lake that serves as a family-friendly place to learn how to water ski. The club was looking for a basic site to market itself and to post news items about recent events, club information, history and membership.

Search engine optimization efforts were based on “Water Skiing on Webster Lake” where it currently sits in the #1 position on Google.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark
Category: Portfolio  Tags: ,  Leave a Comment

Assumption College

Assumption College "Bridge" Design

Assumption College Homepage (2008-2009)

http://www.Assumption.edu

Technologies Used: CSS, XHTML, Flash, JavaScript, PhP/MySQL

This site was a “bridge” design between Assumption’s old website (which was very outdated) to their current portal driven site that they have today. This design was coded and developed over a few weeks and served as a recruiting tool for the incoming class of 2012. This design was retired to make way for the new portal based system in the summer of 2009.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark

Lakota Den Productions

Lakota Den Productions Website

Lakota Den Productions Homepage

http://www.LakotaDenProductions.com

Technologies Used: CSS, XHTML, JavaScript, PhP and Flash.

Lakota Den Productions is a wedding videography company. The site allows prospective clients to view video highlights, find out about pricing/packages and fill out a form to request more information.

Since the company is based in Central Massachusetts, search engine optimization was focused on geographic keywords such as “Wedding Videography in Massachusetts” where the site is constantly ranked in the top five in Google. Although the site was only optimized for 10 keywords, it ranked in the top 20 in major search engines for over 20 different/unique keywords and hit the #1 ranking on Bing/MSN for seven unique keywords.

The company also has a Facebook site and has had a moderate success rate with paid Facebook ads.

No comment so far
Share/Bookmark